Democracy means the right of expression but not the right to disrespect someone. And, even though this is a democratic space, forgive me, we cannot treat this theme in superficial and vicious approaches. Still, to be answered with a minimum of depth would need to be reformulated, not to advance ethical limits. Hawking in comparison with other renowned scientists. Perhaps the author of the question would like to question "the size" of the researcher S. So, as the question was put forward, it does not contemplate an adequate response. He left important contributions regarding the deepening of the issues related to the limitations of General Relativity in the region of high energies and strong gravity, in subjects like the preservation of information in the study of black holes, or topics as the accelerated expansion of the Universe, brane theory, quantum mechanics of the Universe, large N cosmology, gravitational waves, and many other themes. The themes of his works were very relevant to the development of our knowledge about the Universe.
A knowledgeable of the formalisms and experimental data relevant to the topics addressed by him during his academic life. A researcher who had deep mastery of the issues dealt with by him in his articles and books. Hawking (these are the ones I know), we will recognize a serious researcher. If we read, albeit in a less profound way, the 230 publications of S. This issue needs to be addressed with due attention.
0 kommentar(er)
